Testing Guidewire: Designing for Testability

In the fast-paced world of software development, the pursuit of feature-rich applications often overshadows a crucial aspect of system design: #testability. Yet, a testable system is the cornerstone of efficient and effective testing processes, both manual and automated. This article delves into the principles of testability, revealing how thoughtful design choices can dramatically enhance the testing process and, by extension, the overall quality of software.

This article identifies what I believe are the core principles of testability, applicable to any system being developed. I will use #Guidewire as a case study due to its complexity, the brilliance of its testability, and my experience with it.

Before diving into the core principles, it’s important to note that testability does not necessarily equate to usability. A poor user experience can be easily tested with automation, and it would be fast, but it cannot “identify” what is wrong from a usability perspective; human testers, on the other hand, can easily recognize usability issues and identify what is wrong.

Core Principles of Testability

Let’s consider some key factors when designing systems with testability in mind:

1. Modular Architecture: A modular architecture is fundamental to creating maintainable and testable systems. By emphasizing small, reusable components and applying object-oriented principles, developers can create systems that are easier to understand, modify, and extend. This modularity also more easily supports both unit testing and end-to-end (E2E) testing. For example, in a modular insurance system, you might have separate modules for user authentication and login, account creation, and policy submission. This allows you to test each component in isolation and then integrate them for E2E testing.

2. UI Considerations: UI considerations play a vital role in testability, especially for front-end testing. Clear identification and structuring of information sections, consistent and reliable element identification, and predictable element interaction all contribute to straightforward and reliable UI testing, both manual and automated.

3. Comprehensive Logging: A robust logging system provides crucial insights into system behavior during testing. It should offer easily adjustable log levels, allowing testers to fine-tune the verbosity of information as needed for different testing scenarios.

4. Analytics Integration: Analytics integration should be a key consideration for its many benefits, such as performance and system health monitoring. The ability to gather and analyze system metrics lets you gain deeper insights into system performance and behavior under various conditions, increasing the effectiveness of testing efforts.

5. Change Awareness: Identifying current system changes is crucial for focused and efficient testing. Understanding what has been modified in the present iteration allows testers to target affected areas, preventing regressions and streamlining the testing process.

6. Environment Flexibility: Environment flexibility is key to thorough testing. Systems should support easy deployment across multiple environments for comprehensive testing in varied contexts. Critically, developers should be able to make small changes and test them within the complete system scope locally.

7. Data Management: Data management is crucial for creating consistent and repeatable testing scenarios. Implementing systems for easy test data loading and management allows testers to set up specific scenarios quickly and reliably, enhancing both the speed and accuracy of testing processes.

These seven considerations form the foundation of a testable system design. Many of these considerations are inherent in good design practices. However, if they’re not already present, they should be consciously incorporated into your system to enhance testability.

Let’s examine how these principles manifest in a real-world scenario. #Guidewire, a complex insurance platform, serves as an excellent case study for implementing testability in a large-scale system. Guidewire’s features significantly enhance its overall testability.

Guidewire: A Case Study in Testability

#Guidewire InsuranceSuite is a comprehensive platform for property and casualty insurers, providing policy, billing, and claims management. As a leader in the insurance software industry, Guidewire serves as an excellent case study for implementing testability in a large-scale system. Let’s explore how Guidewire’s architecture aligns with our core testability principles:

1. Modular Architecture: Guidewire’s system is built on a component-based architecture, allowing for isolated testing of individual components and easier maintenance. This modular design was crucial in mimicking Guidewire’s process flows into reusable components and effective UI integration.

2. UI Considerations: Guidewire’s PCF (page configuration file) architecture exemplifies OO principles, facilitating targeted and comprehensive UI testing at various levels. This sophistication and complexity is a crucial factor in the generative capabilities of #CenterTest, which leverage the PCF structures to automatically create robust test components.

3. Comprehensive Logging: Guidewire’s logging system was designed to effectively monitor system activity and health with the ability to set specific log levels for many categories of logs. While not tied to automation, it is a critical factor in testability.

4. Analytics Integration: Built-in analytics capabilities enable monitoring of system performance and health. CenterTest extends these analytics allowing every action and interaction to be measured to the smallest detail, providing unmatched analytic capabilities.

5. Change Awareness: CenterTest takes advantage of Guidewire’s architecture letting you identify changes between out-of-the-box (OOTB) functionality and your implementation, enabling focused testing on customizations.

6. Environment Flexibility: Guidewire supports deployment across various environments, letting you quickly change what and where you are testing. Even letting developers do full system development on their local machines and how automation can take advantage of this.

7. Data Management: Guidewire allows preloading of any environment with OOTB test data, enabling immediate testing and easy incorporation of custom test data. Then test automation lets you use any test to seed to any point to simplify a tester’s ability to test.

In summary, Guidewire’s architecture incorporates numerous features that support testability, and we will explore these in much more detail in upcoming articles. The synergy between Guidewire’s design and automation capabilities creates a comprehensive ecosystem that supports efficient and effective testing, contributing significantly to the platform’s overall reliability and maintainability.

Conclusion

#Testability in software design is more than a technical consideration—it’s a mindset that transforms how we approach development. Designing for testability involves creating systems that are easier to test, maintain, and evolve. Incorporating principles like modular architecture, UI considerations, and comprehensive logging allows for more efficient testing capabilities and higher-quality software that is more robust, reliable, and maintainable.

So, ask yourself: “Am I ready to design for testability?” Your future self and your testing team will thank you for it.

If you’re intrigued by the concepts of testability and the potential of #TestAutomation, you’re in for a treat. This article is just the beginning of our Testing Guidewire series, where we’ll explore everything from high-level, thought-provoking ideas to technical deep dives that leverage cutting-edge technology. Each of these topics builds on the foundation of testability we’ve discussed, offering practical insights into its implementation. Stay tuned for our next three articles, followed by more:

• Test Tools vs. Test Libraries vs. Test Frameworks where Arkadiusz Frankowski clarifies the key differences between #TestTools, libraries, and #TestFrameworks to debunk common misconceptions and explore how understanding these differences can significantly enhance your testing strategy.
• Power of the POM where I (Kim Filiatrault) take a deep dive into modernizing #UIAutomation and show you how element identification and interaction driven from your source code will transform your test automation capabilities.
• Narratives where Raivis Sarkovskis unravels the complexities and shortcomings around #BDD (behavior-driven development) and demonstrates how #CenterTest Narratives can revolutionize development while keeping business, testing, and development all involved in the development process.

Kim Filiatrault
Founder and President

---

Watch or read our other posts at Kimputing Blogs. You’ll find everything from Automated testing to CenterTest, Guidewire knowledge to general interest. We’re trying to help share our knowledge from decades of experience.